---
title: "Our Methodology | AI Tool Check"
description: "How we evaluate AI tools for nonprofits. Use-case specific, tier-aware, community-informed ratings."
lang: en
json-ld:
---

[![Common Ground](/assets/common-ground-logo-white-RKdLhTAB.png)](https://www.commongroundconsulting.ai)

[HOME](/)[TOOLS](/tools)[USE CASES](/use-cases)[METHODOLOGY](/methodology)[ALERTS](/alerts)[ABOUT](/about)

Search... ⌘ K[Submit Experience](/submit-experience)

[HOME](/)[TOOLS](/tools)[USE CASES](/use-cases)[METHODOLOGY](/methodology)[ALERTS](/alerts)[ABOUT](/about)

[Submit Experience](/submit-experience)

# How We Evaluate AI Tools

Use-case specific. Tier-aware. Community-informed.

## Our Approach

Most AI tool reviews give you a single score. But the same tool can be safe for one task and risky for another. ChatGPT is fine for drafting a newsletter. It's a problem for client case notes.

We rate every tool for 12 specific nonprofit use cases, so you get answers that match your actual work.

## The Use Cases

Use cases are grouped by inherent risk level based on data sensitivity. Lower-risk use cases involve public content with no sensitive data. Higher-risk use cases involve confidential, regulated, or personally identifiable information.

[Review All 12 Use Cases → ](/use-cases)

## The Rating System

### Green Light:  
Safe

No significant concerns for this use case. Use freely.

### Yellow Light:  
Safe with Precautions

Usable if you follow specific guidelines. Every Yellow rating includes a "Safe if you..." note explaining exactly what to do.

### Red Light:  
Not Recommended

Risk outweighs benefit. Every Red rating includes a specific explanation of the risk.

## Why We Evaluate by Tier

Free and paid tiers often have completely different data policies.

The same tool might be Red on free tier and Green on paid tier for the exact same use case. We evaluate each tier separately because that's what responsible decision-making requires.

## How We Gather Information

### Primary Sources

-   Privacy policies and terms of service 
-   Security documentation and SOC 2 reports 
-   Pricing pages and nonprofit discount information 
-   Accessibility statements 

### Third-Party Verification

-   FedRAMP authorization status 
-   Common Sense Media privacy ratings 
-   Industry certification databases 

We do not accept payment from vendors. These are independent assessments.

## Community Input

The best information comes from nonprofits actually using these tools. Community members report their experiences, flag policy changes, and help keep evaluations current.

[Share Your Experience →](/submit-experience)

## Keeping It Current

-   Every evaluation shows a "last reviewed" date
-   We monitor for policy changes and update ratings
-   Community members help flag changes we might miss

[Report Outdated Information →](/contact)

## Limitations

We review publicly available policies. We cannot audit actual data handling practices. Policies change frequently, sometimes without notice.

Use these evaluations as a starting point, not a final answer. When handling highly sensitive data, consult your own legal or compliance advisors.

## Understanding the Ratings

### FedRAMP Authorized

U.S. government security standard. Tools with this designation passed rigorous federal security review and can be used by government agencies. Authorization levels (Low, Moderate, High) indicate the sensitivity of data they're approved to handle.

### Common Sense Media Privacy Rating

Independent nonprofit that evaluates apps and tools for data privacy practices. Ratings range from Pass to Warning to Fail based on whether the tool sells data, displays targeted ads, or tracks users across sites.

### SOC 2 Type II

Annual security audit by an independent accounting firm. Evaluates whether a company's systems protect customer data over time. Reports are confidential.

### ISO 27001

International standard for information security management. Companies must demonstrate security controls and pass third-party audits.

## Verification Sources

### What We Verify Independently

-   🏛️ FedRAMP authorization verified via marketplace.fedramp.gov and official agency announcements 
-   📋 Common Sense Media privacy ratings included where available 
-   💰 Nonprofit discount availability verified via TechSoup/Goodstack listings 

### What Remains Vendor-Reported

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications are vendor-reported. There is no public database to verify SOC 2 certifications, and ISO 27001 verification requires access to the certificate itself.

Organizations should conduct their own verification before adoption, especially for tools handling sensitive data. Request audit reports directly from vendors for due diligence.

### Contact

-   [+1 202 744 2567](tel:+12027442567)
-   [info@commongroundconsulting.org](<mailto:info@commongroundconsulting.org?subject=AI Tool Check Inquiry>)
-   Global Reach. Local Impact.

### Directory

-   [Browse Tools](/tools)
-   [Use Cases](/use-cases)
-   [Methodology](/methodology)
-   [About](/about)

### Community

-   [Submit Experience](/submit-experience)
-   [Get Alerts](/alerts)
-   [Main Website →](https://www.commongroundconsulting.ai)

### Legal

-   [Privacy Policy](https://www.commongroundconsulting.ai/privacy)
-   [Terms of Service](https://www.commongroundconsulting.ai/terms)
-   [Cookie Policy](https://commongroundconsulting.ai/cookie-policy)
-   [Accessibility](https://www.commongroundconsulting.ai/accessibility)
-   [Our AI Compact](https://commongroundconsulting.ai/ai-disclosures)

[Go to Main Site](https://www.commongroundconsulting.ai)

[© 2026 Common Ground. All rights reserved.](https://www.commongroundconsulting.ai)| Accelerated Impact,Human ConnectionTM 

Follow us: [](https://api.whatsapp.com/send/?phone=12027442567&text&type=phone_number&app_absent=0)[](https://www.linkedin.com/company/common-ground-consulting-llc)[](<mailto:info@commongroundconsulting.org?subject=AI Tool Check Inquiry>)